I transfered a bunch of money to my Armory wallet, but when I set it up, I accidentally set it to offline so I can't receive all of the money. It has already been completed on coinbase so I can't get it back.. I've been trying to get this for days and the only solution I could find was reinstalling it on another computer but I can't do that because my other is windows 32 bit, armory is only for 64 on windows unfortunately :( can anyone help? Thanks!
The latest version of the 64-Bit Armory Bitcoin Wallet (on Ubuntu) crashes after it finishes synchronisation, but before it does the scan. Any ideas?
It will reach the end of the sync, and then just exit/crash out, leaving bitcoin-qt running in the background. I am running Armory off a small SSD & and bitcoin-qt off my main storage HDD. Could it be failing to allocate space to build the databases? with the terminal command:
Trying to install armory bitcoin wallet on raspberry pi. [Help]
Hi I recently just bought my first raspberry pi (model a+) and have installed the latest version of raspbian on it. I am having issues however, with installing the armory application on it. I have been to the armory website and downloaded the latest offline version of armory for rasbian and then launched the install script on the pi. I believe that the script installed the application however, nothing happens when I launch the application. I have never used raspbian or any linux based operating systems before so please bare with me if I'm doing something really stupid. I assume that I am missing some other packages that need to be installed but I have no idea which ones. Armory runs on python on raspbian and I am not sure if I need to install some python packages or if they are pre-installed into the OS. I tried watching this tutorial: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=32lovaPtZws and it was very straight forward however, the links to the packages and armory files are now dead. As I said I am a complete noob at raspbian so I would really appreciate any help possible with getting armory to launch on pi. Thanks!
Disk Digger Pro Apk || DiskDigger Importance || Recover Lost Files
In the Present scenario, Technology is growing too fast and we all are experiencing that our smartphone, PC, and Laptops carrying various files with the help of SD cards and internal memory. We will think that our files are in very secure places but if any file deleted unexpectedly then what you will do?. Don't worry, I already told you that tech is growing as fast as it can. Here I'm going to discuss the bestdata recovery services aka (DiskDigger) which are a perfect example of it. Let's go down to get more details of DiskDigger(Deep file recovery from any drive). DiskDigger is a tool which can recover deleted files like photos, documents, music, video and much more. DiskDigger Features: DiskDigger can recover lost files from most types of media that your computer can read: hard disks, USB flash drives, memory cards, CDs, DVDs, and floppy disks. (Note: Make sure that you have to connect your device with a USB port to recover lost data from Android and IOS devices ). And one more important thing is you have to download the diskdigger app on your android phone to recover lost files. Suppose if your Android device uses a microSD card for saving the data, please remove the card and connect it directly to your PC using a card reader, so that you can scan it directly using DiskDigger for Windows.) DiskDigger has two processes which you have to choose every time while scanning a disk. These methods are named as “dig deep” and “dig deeper“. Dig Deep:
Undelete files from FAT (FAT12, FAT16, FAT32), NTFS, and exFAT partitions.
Recover any type of file.
Filter recoverable files by name and size.
Sort recoverable files by name, size, date, and directory.
Scan (carve) entire disk for traces of specific file types.
View recoverable files as a list, or as thumbnail previews.
Thumbnails will show previews of image files, album art from MP3 and WMA files, and icons from executable files!
Selecting a recoverable file brings up a full preview of the file (insofar as possible). For image files, it will show the image (with pan and zoom). For document files, it will show a text-only preview of the document. For certain audio files, it will allow you to play back the sound.
Previews of JPG and TIFF files will show EXIF information (camera model, date taken, sensor settings, etc.).
Previews of MP3 files will show ID3 information (artist, album, genre, etc.).
Previews of ZIP files will show a list of files contained in the archive.
Able to scan virtual disk image files:
E01 and EWF files (Expert Witness Format)
VMDK files (VMware disk image)
VHD files (Microsoft Virtual Hard Disk)
VDI files (VirtualBox disk image)
Direct binary disk images (acquired with dd or similar tools)
When digging deeper, ability to start scanning from a specific location on the disk.
When previewing files, the program optionally shows the first 4K bytes of the file as a hex dump.
For a hard fork in Bitcoin to succeed, there needs to be near unanimous support from the entire Bitcoin ecosystem, which generally includes the following constituent groups: node operators, users, core developers, wallets, exchanges, and miners. Right now it's very clear that there is a large contingent of users, developers, wallets, and exchanges that have not signed on to this hardfork, so unanimous support is lacking.
Even minor changes in Bitcoin (let alone critical consensus changes) have taken generally many months or years of review and testing by the best experts to ensure the code is safe and bug-free. The timeline for Segwit2X does not allow for the kind of testing and review needed.
The hard fork doesn't address the many concerns over the years that have been brought up about the negative impact of increased load, cost externalities, miner and node centralization, and potential consensus failures
The timeline for the Segwit2X hardfork is such that there is no way for all the major groups to upgrade in time. As Greg Maxwell said:
"Its time-frame is extremely absurd. Actually, absurd doesn't do it justice which is why between that and number #1 several engineers have been just responding "LOL" to the proposal. They don't set any time for design review and analysis, they don't set any time for writing a specification (they don't have one and don't appear to intend to have one), they set aside two weeks for testing-- which is less time than even minor releases of Bitcoin get (and need!) even when they were comprised of small fixes which had mostly existed for months already. They don't allot any time for alternative implementations to implement it (which is especially bad because they can provide useful design feedback). They don't set aside time for meaningful deployment by users (some of whom may have their own lengthy patching and qualification process). They don't seem to have any concern about how forced upgrades erode decentralization and privileged hosted wallets/apis/pools over running your own infrastructure. Basically every stage of the consensus rule change pipeline should take (and always has taken) more time they allotted for everything. BU+Classic BIP109 ran on testnet for months before their interoperability failure was revealed and they forked apart from each other and abandon BIP109."
Now, let's assume for a moment that 80% of the hash power runs this fork as well as some of the economic ecosystem that signed the New York agreement like Abra, Bitpay, Coinbase, Blockchain, Purse, Shapeshift, Xapo, etc. What would happen? First, a large number of users and other parts of the ecosystem might not support it. There are many economic parties that were not part of the agreement, such as wallets like Trezor, MyCellium, Armory, Bitcoin Wallet (Android), Green Address, Breadwallet, Electrum, etc. There were a lot of exchanges that weren't part of the agreement, like Kraken, Poloniex, Bitstamp, Gemini, Bithumb, Bitfinex. What if several of those mentioned major economic players decide not to support Segwit2X and don't run the Segwit2X/btc1/NY client? I believe what would happen in that scenario is the following:
Bitcoin will permanently hard fork into two chains (note, this is not the oft-discussed chain split that could happen with BIP-148). If the companies switching to the new chain insist on trying to call it "Bitcoin" instead of something else like "Bitcoin2X" then it would probably cause massive confusion in the ecosystem because everyone else still on the original chain would still call that chain "Bitcoin".
Since the vast majority of core developers don't support this proposal, I believe after some possible period of confusion, eventually everyone would converge back to calling the original chain Bitcoin since it's the chain that is supported by the Bitcoin Core "reference client" that is trusted by the majority of users today. The companies that signed the New York agreement would probably be forced to abandon trying to calling the new chain "Bitcoin" due to the confusion that would cause. They would have to call the new chain something else like "Bitcoin2X".
If there were two chains, many of the exchanges that were not party to the New York agreement, such as Kraken, Poloniex, Bitstamp, Gemini, Bithumb, Bitfinex, etc. just to name a few would probably list both coins at the least, or possibly just the original chain only. That would also put pressure on the exchanges that signed the New York agreement to still provide users access to their coins on the original chain if there was a market for the original chain coins because to do otherwise could be seen by the users as a loss of economic value that they should be entitled to. After the Ethereum hard fork, a few hosted wallet companies tried to ignore the fact that their users were entitled to coins from the original chain, but were eventually forced to concede and give their users access to the coins on the original chain.
Finally, I am speculating here, but I believe with both coins listed on various exchanges, users would by a large majority choose to buy the original coin supported by the Bitcoin Core client, NOT the coin supported by the Segwit2X/btc1/NY client. Further, they would probably sell the Segwit2X/btc1/NY coins for core coins, forcing their price of Segwit2X/btc1/NY coins down significantly. If the price of the original coin is higher and the Segwit2X/btc1/NY coin is lower, there would then be an enormous incentive for miners to abandon the new Segwit2X/btc1/NY fork and return to mining the original fork. Even if the 80% of the mining hashpower that signed the New York agreement agreed to mine on the new chain, how long would they keep that up when they see they could make more money by switching back to the original Bitcoin chain being supported by higher prices and buy orders? I posit that so long as the users financially support the original chain supported by Bitcoin Core, the vast majority of miners will act in their own self interest and abandon the new Segwit2X/btc1/NY chain because it won't be as economically feasible to mine. Eventually, given that most developers won't support the Segwit2X/btc1/NY client, the coin will lose interest and possibly die off or remain a minor altcoin.
An important point to keep in mind is that nearly every core developer has at one point in time supported the idea of a hard fork and even larger blocks. But what they haven't supported is doing it without a high degree of consensus on forking safely, without the best research, lots of testing, and a very long time horizon. If we truly want to hard fork Bitcoin, we need to do it wisely, following the very challenging but necessary process for making such critical consensus changes. And it needs to be done with an open community process, not with a New York style agreement that leaves out major parts of the ecosystem. Bitcoin core is not the enemy of hardforks, or even block size increases. But there has to be very good justification for making these changes, a high degree of consensus and buy-in from the whole ecosystem, lots of research, good code, lots of testing, and a compelling need. It's a high bar, but not impossible. While there exists methods of getting more scale with safer methods (Schnorr signatures, bi-directional payment channels, transaction cut-through, extension blocks, lightning, flex caps, drivechains, etc.) hard forks seem less compelling for the moment.
PSA For Noobs: Getting started in the bitcoin economy
Wallets: Electrum, armory, bitcoin wallet (android), blockchain (android/iphone), bitcoin-Qt, coinbase Bitcoin-Qt is the "full" client and requires you to download every transaction ever made onto your computer. This file is ~13GB(?) and the process can take several days. Here is a basic introductory video: http://www.weusecoins.com/en/ Here are paper wallets: www.bitcoinpaperwallet.com Here is an HTML file of 100+ bookmarks to bitcoin services/merchants/news/information which you will find very fascinating. http://www.fileswap.com/dl/8U3bZPAyOD/ A 'public key' is your bank address/account, and a 'private key' gives you access to the funds stored in a public key. Never share your private keys with anyone, ever. When encrypting your wallet, WRITE DOWN YOUR PASSWORD. If you lose this password, you lose your coins. Period. Here is an advanced video of the inner workings of the software: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lx9zgZCMqXE Enjoy!!!
[PAID REQUEST] Need help modifying code, and compiling software
Hello Python People! I hope this sort of request is permitted here. If not, I'll gladly remove it. I need some help with modifying some source code for a python software plugin, and getting that plugin to run in the software. I was running the Armory Bitcoin Wallet. However my wallet passphrase (which was copy/pasted when I created the wallet) is not working. It's likely I missed copying a word, or it was too long for my password manager's text input field. There is a passphrase finder plugin for brute forcing an armory passphrase available on github. But it requires removing/changing some code to remove the sig check, and compiling into the armory source code before installation. I've tried to wrap my head around this, and I've been trying to learn python for a while now (I am completely new to coding/git etc otherwise) but I've not made any progress towards getting the plugin to run inside the Armory software. I've also hit up the armory dev, but he's not being particularly helpful for someone with my lack of skills. Obviously I'm not going to hand over my wallet file, but I'm happy to offer 0.1BTC to anyone who can help me successfully unlock my wallet (and learn some python/git along the way) If someone here is willing to help, I'd really like to be shown what code I need to change, and why. And also how to compile it all so the plugin will run in the Armory client. Please drop me a PM or reply below, and I'll send you all of the info I have. I also use telegram so it may be easier to liase there. Cheers, t0m80w
So I just ordered bitcoin from a seller who gave me my bitcoins and then off the local bitcoins site I copied over my wallet address from Armory and sent the bitcoins over. It says on local bitcoins that my coins have been sent yet on my armory wallet the funds are still at 0 even after 4 hours since the transfer occurred. I looked up the address on blockchain and it says my transaction has occurred and that it have 15 confirmations? can anyone help me?
NO Is it okay starting bitcoin now?? Can armory wallet be used in pruned mode?
Could anyone help me find some answers? Been trading manually and would like to put my CE degree to work. Nowadays it's a big industry and the bitcoin capitalisation exceeds the gross domestic product of some countries. It's a pain. Reading or learning material?
[WTS] Bitcoin Armory Wallet with .36996 BTC [WTB] .355 BTC
Hey so I'd want a middleman or something for sure for this or escrow but basically I am a bitcoin noob and I sent money to an armory wallet that I cannot figure out what is wrong with it. I've tried installing it on a different pc and I can always see how much btc I have but I can't figure out how to set it up right so that I can send it to my main wallet. I have been trying for almost a week to configure it but to no luck so if you're already adept with armory I can just give you my armory password/ recovery key and you can assess the bitcoin then keep some of it for yourself and give me .355, i really just desperately want my btc in a way I can control it. Not sure who does escrow here but please send some pms if you're a mod or something and can
03-02 20:34 - '[Help Required] Armory Wallet Not Functioning' (self.Bitcoin) by /u/PlayOf5 removed from /r/Bitcoin within 1150-1160min
''' I'm no expert in managing applications and computers in general, so I need help from you guys to fix an issue I have. I transferred a significant amount of bitcoin to Armory wallet, and I've had trouble setting it up and getting it to go online mode. I have downloaded Bitcoin core and installed the 220gb worth of logs. The problem is Armory is stuck in "Organizing blockchain". I've even left it there for days on end waiting for it to get completed. What should I do to get Armory working so I can actually access my bitcoins? Thank you. [link]1 ''' [Help Required] Armory Wallet Not Functioning Go1dfish undelete link unreddit undelete link Author: PlayOf5 1: **r*dd*it/ch*k0u*ss*j21.png Unknown links are censored to prevent spreading illicit content.
Bitcoin Armory, got BTC deposited into my wallet but it is OFFLINE, NEED HELP GETTING IT ONLINE!!!!
as the title said, i got a deposit into my bitcoin armory wallet, and its offline, i think cold storage is the word used. I am looking for help getting it back online as i am not a computer guy in the slightest. its all very very new and scary to me, ive moved it to my D:/ drive for more space, did the little that I could. I would greatly appreciate any help and figured this is the place to do it. Ive found out the company is dissolved and it is maintained by the community so i figured why not come to the biggest community in the world!
If i use something like Armory on a laptop that has never been connected to the internet to create a paper wallet, will i be able to send bitcoins to that wallet even though it's never been connected to the internet before, during, or after the paper wallet was created?
BEST BITCOIN WALLET. Armory is the most secure and full featured solution available for users and institutions to generate and store Bitcoin private keys. This means users never have to trust the Armory team and can use it with the Glacier Protocol. Satoshi would be proud! Users are empowered with multiple encrypted Bitcoin wallets and permanent one-time ‘paper backups’. Armory pioneered ... Bitcoin Armory ist eine Open-Source-, Python-basierte, Wallet-Management-Anwendung für das Bitcoin-Netzwerk.. Armory ist eine Desktop-Anwendung für das Bitcoin-Fondsmanagement. Es ist eine voll ausgestattete Bitcoin-Wallet-Management-Anwendung, die darauf abzielt, die beiden Eigenschaften von Brieftaschen zu kombinieren, die bisher als sich gegenseitig ausschließend empfunden wurden ... Armory Armory is an advanced Bitcoin client that expands its features for Bitcoin power users. It offers many backup and encryption features, and it allows secure cold-storage on offline computers. Features: Full Node × Full Node: Some wallets fully validate transactions and blocks. Almost all full nodes help the network by accepting transactions and blocks from other full nodes, validating ... Recently I decided to migrate my bitcoin from Armory wallet cold storage to the BIP39 and related standards. I hadn't switched on the offline PC in a long time, and neither had I updated the blockchain on the online PC. Thus, I started considering my recovery options should something have broken or gone missing. Below are some of the ways I found to recover and move bitcoin in such failure ... Armory is used by some of the most heavily-invested, and most paranoid Bitcoin enthusiasts and cloud miners for maximum privacy and security. If you are in this category, it is recommended you verify that your Armory installers have not been altered in any way. Armory Ubuntu/Debian packages (*.deb files) are signed directly using our [Offline ...
Beginner's guide: Installing Bitcoin Armory on Windows 7
http://bit.ly/2nkc30U Learn how to get started today! How to Download and Verify the Armory Bitcoin Wallet - Duration: 22:31. Rex Kneisley 4,803 views. 22:31. Setting up cold storage in Armory on Ubuntu 14.04 - Duration: 27:01. ... Alan Reiner from Bitcoin Armory discussing mulit-sig Lock boxes - Duration: 3 ... How to Download and Verify the Armory Bitcoin Wallet - Duration: 22:31. Rex Kneisley 5,066 views. 22:31 . Sweeping ... How to install Armory 0.93 and Bitcoin Core 0.10 on Windows 7, and how to create your first wallet. A guide for beginners. Enable subtitles in the video. If you like the guide, feel free to send a ... How to make an offline bitcoin wallet using Armory - Duration: 14:55. TheMetaTainment 38,115 views. 14:55. How Rich People Invest Their Money - Duration: 1:21:33. ...